HomeCrimeState destroyed firearm from 'Rust' shooting

State destroyed firearm from ‘Rust’ shooting

Alec Baldwin composite featuring, clockwise from left: a still image of the actor in costume, an image of a smiling Halyna Hutchins, and an aerial shot of the set of the movie "Rust."

Alec Baldwin stands accused of the involuntary manslaughter of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins (top right) on the set of “Rust” (bottom right).

Actor Alec Baldwin’s attorney told a judge on Thursday that the New Mexico government destroyed the firearm from the deadly “Rust” shooting that killed the film’s cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Baldwin’s attorney Alex Spiro obliquely described the surprising development during a virtual hearing on Thursday.

“I think I should tell the court that the firearm in this case, that’s a great subject of it, was destroyed,” Spiro remarked.

“So that’s obviously an issue,” he coolly remarked, with some understatement.

Spiro said that he’d like to see that firearm — or “what’s left of” it.

On Jan. 19, 2020, Baldwin and “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed were charged with involuntary manslaughter for their alleged role in the tragic shooting on Oct. 21, 2021. Both deny any criminal liability for the events, but prosecutors claim that, if not for them, Hutchins will still be alive.

As the case prepares for trial, the two of them both achieved a significant victory, after prosecutors dropped a sentencing enhancement that raised the possibility of five years of imprisonment over their heads. Baldwin successfully argued that the enhancement was unconstitutional, as it cited a law revised well after the late 2021 shooting.

After Reed joined Baldwin’s motion, prosecutors voluntarily withdrew the enhancement, claiming that doing so would “avoid further litigious distractions by Mr. Baldwin and his attorneys.” Baldwin’s attorneys skewered those public swipes as an extraordinary reaction to their “meritorious motion.”

But Baldwin’s pretrial litigation is not done.

The “Beetlejuice” actor has sought to disqualify special prosecutor Andrea Reeb, arguing that New Mexico’s constitution forbids her from playing any judicial role while she’s simultaneously serving as a Republican lawmaker in the state’s House of Representatives.

“Under Section 1 of Article III of the New Mexico Constitution, however, a sitting member of the Legislature may not ‘exercise any powers properly belonging’ to either the executive or judicial branch,” Baldwin’s attorney Luke Nikas writes in a Feb. 7 motion to disqualify, also joined by Reed’s legal team.

New Mexico Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer scheduled a hearing for March 27 on that motion.

A preliminary examination has been scheduled for May.

The film’s assistant director David Halls signed an as-yet-undisclosed plea agreement for a different charge: negligent use of a deadly weapon, which would have the AD serve a suspended sentence and six months of probation. That deal is not yet public.

This is a developing story.

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular

- Advertisment -
Share on Social Media